Originally Posted by Eta C

Well, for interest, this is being published in the current issue of Physical Review Letters. You have to buy the article or have a subscription, but here's a link to the abstract. I would imagine this paper has more detail than the popular science press releases that have been discussed so far. I have a PRL subscription and will take a look at it.

BTW, I love this because it puts the spoke in Jerry's usual contention that mainstream science somehow "suppresses" this sort of thing. PRL is as mainstream as it gets, arguably the premier physics journal in the world. Just goes to show that when results seem to disagree with theory, even at a tiny level, scientists show interest.

Of course Jerry will probably say that we're finally "waking up" to this and that the revolution that will overthrow everything from Archimedes to Weinberg and Hawking is imminent. Total garbage of course. Also note that the abstract mentions a quantitative prediction for another probe pass. Take note Jerry, that's how science is done.

P.S. Ketterle still has his Nobel.