I don't normally post anything to any thread, but I felt the need to ask a couple of questions.

If all science starts with the same evidence, same world, same universe, same laws of physics, then the only difference is the bias that one starts with.

If your bias is that there is a God that created everything with a specific order for life to even exist, then you are studying that order that's inherent in the universe.

If your bias is that there is no creator and that all existence is a mere chance event, or random collisions of matter, and that the order in the universe is just a chance event, you’re still studying the order that's inherent in the universe.

If you want to believe that there is a Creator God that created the universe and created life on this planet and created order in the universe, rather than believe that your a chance event and the order in the universe is just an accident, then, what is the problem with faith?
Either way, you have to start with an assumption (or bias). Your results will be the same. 2+2 will always equal 4 no matter which bias you start with.