Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumping
Ok. That sounds great and believeable. It's still a "big bang" that no one was there to observe, and I'll grant that science has been using the "big bang" theory for a while, but they still have never observed it. If science is based on testable theories that what is the "big bang"?
About the "interaction of organic molecules", this has not been observed either. Science hasn't even been able to reproduce it. Even if scientists could reproduce the "interaction of organic molecules" to create life, then they were the intelligent design behind it. It's still life from non life. Sounds like it still takes faith.
|
You seem to have some misperception of just how science actually works, and what the actual scientific theories about the Big Bang and the origin of life really say. Here's some starting information to help you better understand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
|