07-March-2008, 08:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 43
|
|
I took the 140 records and sorted them by year. Then I deleted out the duplicate years. This gave me unique years where the monthly sunspot number was in the top 4 ½ %.
This is my list.
Then I marked the location of the peak years on my “The Solar Systems Torque” graph. If there were consecutive years with high sunspot numbers I only used one arrow. All of the arrows were close enough to the aphelion and perihelion that this bears further analysis.
The six points on the positive side of the graph only vary by 14 % of the total range. And I guess that would mean that if you took there average, none of the 6 points would vary more than 7% from the average. That’s not a bad coincidence is it? I will double check my work.
|