Thread: Red Hair
View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2008, 08:53 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DyerWolf View Post
I think that's a bit too strong of a presumption.
Probably. But the point I was trying to make (needlessly, as it turns out) was that information would have spread very, very slowly, too much to effect all the gene pools.


Quote:
If various members of the homo family lived in proximity to one another, it is quite possible for them to have interbred - especially on the fringes where the groups intermingled. If for no other reason than because outcasts find outcasts.
It isn't known whether it's possible or not. Genetics isn't that simple, there may be a specific gene or set of genes that wasn't compatible. Even among humans, it sometimes happens that two individuals are not mutually interfertile. Amount of genetic difference plays only part of the role, the specific types of those genes also matter. What you say makes logical sense, but that's not evidence. Without living Neanderthals to examine, it's an open qustion.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote