Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Luxon Unification Theory
Combining Luxen Theory
With
A Compiled Theory on Primal Forces
|
Lux[b]o[/ b]n or Lux
en? Please make up your mind or is one (some unknown form of) plural of the other?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
The Universe Contains Only Energy
In September 1997, physicists created matter out of pure light. This was the verification scientists needed to explain how all matter evolved. Matter is just forms of trapped electromagnetic energy.
|
As said before, a citation would be nice, I think you may hint at
this but why leave it to the reader to find the relevant information?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
What is a Luxen?
A Luxen is a particle that always moves with a velocity with that which is lightspeed (v=c).
|
so a "Luxen" is a photon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Light is made up of photons. They are the smallest energy units known to us, and move with a velocity of 186,000 miles per sec or 299,792,458 m/s.
|
Not really, that depends on the "frequency" of the photon, doesn't it? The equation that you are going to use later with E = h f, so the higher the frequency the more energy the photon has.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
They are what are called zero-time particles. This means that the photon does not experience any time at all. And if it experiences no time, then the photon spends no 'time' in space either. This is hard to imagine... after all, doesn't the photon move through space? Doesn't a photon take time to get from A to B? Well, this all sounds correct from our point of view, but from a photons point of view it is very different. It is just another bizarre situation in relativity.
|
Well at least this disposes with the idea of tired light.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
The universe, when it expanded from its singular region in space and time, grew quite old before light emerged. In fact, something equivalent to thirty-two years had passed before light emerged. We believe this, because the universe began with a time-scale called the 'first chronon.'
|
usually "the first chronon" is the Planck time and not 32 years or whatever value you want to give. But this would not be the first time you change the meaning of standard terms in physics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
We are made up of many Luxens called gluons. In fact, 98.12% of our bodies are made up of gluon mass. The remaining 1.88% is made up of quarks and electrons, (of course, we are made up of other percentages and types of particles).
|
So the mass of a proton is created by the gluon and not by the mass of the quarks? From Wiki (often a good primer to see if your ideas agree with standard theory. Oh, but this is ATM so we do not have to care about standard theory) we find the following quote on gluons:
While massive spin-1 particles have three polarization states, massless gauge bosons like the gluon have only two polarization states (read the rest later, but the limit is a few MeV, which would mean a few times the electron energy, and quarks have more mass).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Does the photon have mass? The short answer is no.
|
well at least here we agree
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Some people find it difficult to comprehend a photon as being massless because it can be deflected by the gravity of, let us say a star. One way to explain this is by saying light couples to gravity, because light also generates curvature and curvature is the equivalence of gravity. However, there is too little amount of light to have any major gravitational effects in our universe, except for perhaps 32 years after big bang, when the universe was flooded in light particles. For those who like math, here are some more reasons why the photon does not have mass.
|
(my bold)
I thought photons follow geodesics and in curved space time geodesics are not straight but curved. Never heard about light creating curvature.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
The photon is responsible for the 'electromagnetic force' - which was first predicted by physicist James Clerk Maxwell in 1865 which was experimentally proven in 1888 by Heinrich Hertz in his detection of radio waves.
|
What was predicted and what was observed here? very confused!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Looking at the Feynman diagram shows a virtual photon exchange between a positron (antielectron) and an electron - thus it mediates the electromagnetic force, and comes in many different states; in this sense, light is electromagnetic radiation of absolutely any wavelength, such as radio waves, microwaves, ultraviolet rays, x-rays, gamma rays, infrared light waves and of course, visible light rays. The photon can be slowed down whenever, let's say it is absorbed by other mass or whenever it transfer’s energy and momentum which are both proportional to its frequency.
|
Well, in a Feynman diagram the EM interaction between the two is described by the interchange of a virtual photon. The photon does not mediate the EM force because it is in the Feynman diagram (as your "thus" seems to imply).
and then "in this sense", whatever do you want to say in that sentence, apart from stating the obvious that electromagnetic waves can also be seen as photons.
If a photon is absorbed it does not slow down, it disappears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
The photon itself was originally called 'light quantum,' or 'das Lichtquant,' by Sir Albert Einstein. (... snip ...) The photon is probably [one] of the strangest particles in physics.
|
I don't think Einstein was "sir"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
The first reason is because it experiences zero dimensions. Because it is a zero-time particle, it spends absolutely no time at all to get from A to B. (... snip ...) One way being that the photon is never really born in time, because it doesn't experience time - yet this must also mean it never dies.
|
some new age babble
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Bradyons, Luxen and Tachyons
|
First time I heard about a "bradyon" but it seems to be a real term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
I am somewhat perplexed to why nature would create two very distinct particles. One of them are these speedy maximal-velocity of energetic particles – and these slow Tardyonic matter.
|
Why not? Nature does not have to have a reason, it just does/is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Luxens seem to have been created so that they would evolve into matter
|
why would that be?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Tachyons – particles that have an imaginary mass, which use as little energy at a constant speed at many times the value of ‘’c’’ – and can have an infinite amount of energy at the lowest speed possible, being ‘’c’’… but that’s impossible, for it is like saying the maximal speed for a proton is ‘’c’’, but it would require also an infinity energy and this is forbidden.
|
use as little energy? what is that supposed to mean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
photons and Bradyons are unique in the design of a ‘’special boundary’’ in nature.
Any particle, even tachyon energy has arrest mass M and mass-energy E has a momentum in energy-units given by:
E2 = P2 + M2
|
so I guess you put c=1 here? otherwise you are in trouble.
For tardyons (normal particles) it should be clear from this equation that E cannot be less than M and is always greater than P. This is why there is so much energy contained in a thing. A standard marble has about 1093 grams of energy. That’s a lot of energy indeed. But a tachyon would contain M2 that would be negative. This makes the energy equation:
E2 = P2 - |M|2 or P2 = E2 + |M|2
[/quote]
Tardyons, for those who missed it explanation, are the same as bradyons, what most of us would call "normal particles with rest mass".
A standard marbel has 1093 gram? that is one heck of a marble, I think you even want to say it has 10
93 gram of energy, whatever that may mean. How do you get to this value?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
This means that E can be as small as zero (when P = |M|) and that P is always greater than E and cannot be less than |M|. These quantities are related to the relativistic velocity ß by the equation
ß = P/E
This informs us that when a tachyon has its least amount of momentum
|
This only looks like that because you are looking at everything from a "real" viewpoint, whereas you already said that mass would be imaginary, so you have to work in the complex plane, which is not so bad as you only have 2 variables in the scalar equations. You might want to read up on it again in Wiki. But then, tachyons have not been observed, and may not exist even in mainstream, but not because of any negative energy arguments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
But even though these equations describe superluminal systems, we are not really predicted by relativity.
|
I am glad we are not predicted by relativity
<more in the next post>