Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
We all know that if we could freeze the vacuum (which is -273Kelvin), the energy cannot be frozen.
|
what is this supposed to mean? freezing vacuum? vacuum means there is nothing there, nothing there means there is nothing to give it a temperature, unless you have background radiation like in space, which is something else then the temperature of vacuum. -273 CELSIUS I think you mean is absolute zero on the KELVIN scale. Get your facts right, -273 K does not exists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
There is a massive amount of energy movement that cannot be quelled. The process of freezing a quantum system, like a group of atomic and subatomic particles will slow it down, but the energy they contain disallows them to ever be totally stationary. There is an interesting connection between the limit at zero Kelvin, and the limit of the speed of light.
|
I think we are doing a very good job at reaching absolute zero actually. What kind of energies do you mean here, now it just looks just like so much more new age babble. Do you mean zero point energy or internal energy of the proton, or better make that gluon, or what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
This limit brings a superior link with what we know as fast and slow particles… a limit of infinite movement at lowest speeds, and a limit of infinite energy required at the fastest speeds --- apart from Luxens.
|
HUH? what is infinite movement? If we reach 0 Kelvin all motion stops of the cooled specimen. Would that be a limit to FINITE motion? that there cannot be no-motion?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
The equations describing the velocity of matter is always measured against luxen energy: ''c'' the light of speed.
t' = t_0√1 - v²/c²
m'= m_0/√1 - v²/c²
l'=l_0√1 - v²/c²
|
Well, at least the equations are correct, but the speed of light (or luxen) is now and energy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
Photons do not interact with each other. This is because they tend to fall into the same quantum states called named ‘’Bose-Einstein Statistics,’’ and is caused fundamentally because they have no electric charge, so they cannot interact with electrically charged vrtual photons.
|
Uhhhhh, then why the comment above that scientists created matter out of light. Don't the photons have to interact to create the matter? And why would Bose-Einstein statistics disallow photons to interact? And why are virtual photons electrically charged? Are you mixing here virtual photons with virtual particle pairs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
A virtual particle does not necessarilyobey:
m2c4 = E2 − p2c2
|
I put in the bolded word, see Wiki "virtual particle" for an intro and read a book to get more information.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
A moving photon allows for relativity to give the photon the ability to mediate not only electronic force, but also a magnetic force, given as electromagnetism. The photon has an energy of only 4×10–19 Joules. That’s 0.0000000000000000004 Joules, and the photon can only interact with matter by transferring energy:
E=hc/
Where is Planck's Constant and has a value of:
h =6.626 068 (33) x 10 -34 J . s = 4.135 667 33(10) x 10 -15 eV . s
|
The virtual photon carries the interaction of the EM field, be it electric or magnetic. Whatever this has to do with relativity I fail to see. Also "given as electromagnetism" is supposed to mean what, apart from seemingly being some profound statement?
The photon has an energy of ..., well, it could have, how do you come to this value? what are the things you put in? why specifically that energy?
The photon can give energy to matter (being absorbed) OR it can give momentum to matter (colliding without being absorbed) in which is only gives up part of its energy. You state things here that sound profound, but on a bit closer look show that you have not really thought out the details.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
It first states that there was an intrinsic reason to why the wave function allowed the probability of two unique particles: The Luxens and Bradyons. The Bradyons have a rest mass, but it can be collided with its antipartner, produces two gamma waves of energy. This is matter reverting to energy:
M = E/c2
|
NO, nowhere above was anything of the like stated, you have discussed, sort of, why there should not be tachyons, for the rest you have made unsubstantiated comments on how particle physics should be, but never ever discussed anti-particles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
And since we have made matter out of Luxen Light Energy, then the theory stands that all matter evolved in this very way. The idea I have developed is how to unify the photon-photon combination, because current theory states that two photons do not interact.
|
NOT AT ALL! One of the way or creating electron-positron pairs in a neutron star magnetosphere is by photon-photon collisions. Get your facts right.
You have not presented anything yet, apart from some correct and some incorrect physics, but there has been presented no model at all unifying the photon-photon interaction with particle-antiparticle interaction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
If matter-antimatter coherence releases twice as much energy than what it contained giving off two photons, then how did the two photons combine in the first place?
|
What is this supposed to mean? if an electron and a positron get together and annihilate, you will get 2 0.5 MeV gamma photons, exactly the amount of rest mass energy (if the two particles were at rest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
We can make photon-photon collisions in theory, and create new particles however. Two photons have come together to create a new type of matter. This is what happened years after big bang. Light came out of the Aether and somehow joined together creating matter. Some of the Photons that escaped would evolve during the inflationary period, which happened around 10 -33 after big bang. We have also covered that there is no such thing as matter. There is only energy, and even this energy calculates to nothing when added with the negative energy of the vacuum, which still strangely persists an error of 122~ magntitudes.
|
Not only in theory, but also in practice, as your claim in the beginning was and which I found for you on the web. This now has been done in the lab.
Oh dear, now suddenly we have to have an eather, where did that come from?
And what kind of babble do you have at the end there? I think the only place where there is no matter might be in
ad hominim, do not go there. So basically, you need to come up with something significant, citations of your sources, better description of values you assume to be correct, etc. etc.
Like I said in the other thread, concentrate on one thing at the time. I am a professional space physicist and I cannot write two papers at the time. Now, this may be because I am a bad scientist, but I kinda think that it has to do with keeping ones focus point on the topic, instead of straying in every which direction.