I hope you are asking these question geniunly for correct answers, and not trying to make a mockery of my work.

''what is this supposed to mean? freezing vacuum? vacuum means there is nothing there, nothing there means there is nothing to give it a temperature, unless you have background radiation like in space, which is something else then the temperature of vacuum. -273 CELSIUS I think you mean is absolute zero on the KELVIN scale. Get your facts right, -273 K does not exists.''

If you removed all the matter and energy from the vacuum, an infinite amount of energy still exists. This is called the Zero-Point Energy Field, and if it where possible to freeze the vacuum down to -273K, then there would still be movement.

''HUH? what is infinite movement? If we reach 0 Kelvin all motion stops of the cooled specimen. Would that be a limit to FINITE motion? that there cannot be no-motion?''

No, i have just shown you to be incorrect here.

''Uhhhhh, then why the comment above that scientists created matter out of light. Don't the photons have to interact to create the matter? And why would Bose-Einstein statistics disallow photons to interact? And why are virtual photons electrically charged? Are you mixing here virtual photons with virtual particle pairs?''

We can force photons to hit each other, but normally in reality, they do not interact with each other. I do believe i had made this clear.

''NOT AT ALL! One of the way or creating electron-positron pairs in a neutron star magnetosphere is by photon-photon collisions. Get your facts right.

You have not presented anything yet, apart from some correct and some incorrect physics, but there has been presented no model at all unifying the photon-photon interaction with particle-antiparticle interaction.''

Learn how to read and take in. If the first energy in the universe was the photon, then all types of matter are forms of evolved light. Photons are the most primal particle known. Magneto-stars and whatever have nothing to do with what i am talking about.

''Not only in theory, but also in practice, as your claim in the beginning was and which I found for you on the web. This now has been done in the lab.

Oh dear, now suddenly we have to have an eather, where did that come from?

And what kind of babble do you have at the end there? I think the only place where there is no matter might be in ad hominim, do not go there. So basically, you need to come up with something significant, citations of your sources, better description of values you assume to be correct, etc. etc.

Like I said in the other thread, concentrate on one thing at the time. I am a professional space physicist and I cannot write two papers at the time. Now, this may be because I am a bad scientist, but I kinda think that it has to do with keeping ones focus point on the topic, instead of straying in every which direction.''

The aether is the Zero-Point Field. Check Diracs, ''Do we need an Aether?'' in respect to a quantum aether. The answer is yes.

Now... go and learn some physics. I wouldn't be as so bold as to post nonesense when i know fine well anyone in the world can read it.