View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-March-2008, 05:07 PM
tusenfem's Avatar
tusenfem tusenfem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 3,284
Send a message via Yahoo to tusenfem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
''So the mass of a proton is created by the gluon and not by the mass of the quarks? From Wiki (often a good primer to see if your ideas agree with standard theory. Oh, but this is ATM so we do not have to care about standard theory) we find the following quote on gluons: While massive spin-1 particles have three polarization states, massless gauge bosons like the gluon have only two polarization states (read the rest later, but the limit is a few MeV, which would mean a few times the electron energy, and quarks have more mass).''

Actually, when two quarks come together, there is more energy there than what they contained which makes gluon energy. Don't mix up things i say.
But this is EXACTLY what you said, I quote: In fact, 98.12% of our bodies are made up of gluon mass. I did not mix anything up here, you just don't know anymore what you write. Quarks have mass, much more that gluons, period, final, read up on it in a book


Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Light can generate its own curvature, or distortions of spacetime. This is how photons couple to gravity.
care to quote some mainstream source for this nonsense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
32 years has nothing to do with the Planck Length 10^-33 or 10^-35.
I was not talking about the Planck length but about the Planck TIME. One Planck TIME is normally used as "first chronon" not 32 years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Bradyons are simply Tardyons: v<c.
Thanks for the late explanation, this should have been in your first post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
The photon is chargless, but it does indeed mediate a force. You should know this without question.
Yes, I know that, but you do not seem to know that from your first post, don't attack me on mistakes you make talking about "charged viritual photons".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Yes... the power wasn't raised 10^93/ a peice of matter contains a whopping amount of energy you know. How do you think we created the atom bomb|?
How on Earth can a piece of matter, a marble, contain 1093 GRAM of energy, anyway as said in your closed thread (the same as this one) in general science, energy is not measured in gram but in Joules. So, correct your mistakes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Oh and eh... wiki? I don't recite from wiki unless i really have to.
Wiki may not be perfect, but at least it gives you a handhold for the first step and then you can go to a textbook, which might not immediately be available for you. I do read the wiki pages first before I link to them on BAUT.
__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)