Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''But this is EXACTLY what you said, I quote: In fact, 98.12% of our bodies are made up of gluon mass. I did not mix anything up here, you just don't know anymore what you write. Quarks have mass, much more that gluons, period, final, read up on it in a book''
I am not going to argue anymore on this.
|
Hopefully, this means that you see that what you wrote and what you thought you wrote were not the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''care to quote some mainstream source for this nonsense?''
Care to learn some relativity?
|
You claim that light curves space, just like mass. I have never been taught the like, no ofcourse this could be that my university teachers (e.g. Gerard 't Hooft) had it wrong, but I would love to see which book you are using for this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''I was not talking about the Planck length but about the Planck TIME. One Planck TIME is normally used as "first chronon" not 32 years.''
The Planck Time is the smallest known time. No matter existed until 32 years had passed. A chronon is thebillionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of one second. I am talking about distances in time much farther than a mere 5.3 x 10^-44.
|
Totally irrelevant blahblah. If you google "first chronon" you will mainly find references to the Planck time. If you want to redefine this, okay, no problem, but state that you redefine terms.
And once again you are mixing up time and distance, do you know the difference?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''Yes, I know that, but you do not seem to know that from your first post, don't attack me on mistakes you make talking about "charged viritual photons".''
Where did i ever say a photon has a charge, virtual or not?
|
How about in your first post here on the top of the page, at the beginning of your point 2:
Quote:
|
so they cannot interact with electrically charged vrtual photons.
|
Although I must say you are talking about a vrtual photon, which may be a whole new particle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''How on Earth can a piece of matter, a marble, contain 1093 GRAM of energy, anyway as said in your closed thread (the same as this one) in general science, energy is not measured in gram but in Joules. So, correct your mistakes.''
You can measure any amount in grams. It's not widely used, but it is used nonethless. Check Dr Wolf's book, ''Spiritual Universe for reference.''
|
Sure you can measure energy in equivalent mass, thank you Mr. Einstein. But you cannot have more equivalent mass in that marble that the mass it has. And "spiritual universe" ??? if that is the resourced you use for your physics, I don't wonder anymore that you have such strange ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''Once more -273 Kelvin DOES NOT EXIST. ZPE is not infinite, and there cannot be motion in vacuum, because vacuum means there are no particles to move, unless you invoke here the virtual particle sea.''
Then you don't know physics. ZPE is a sea of an infinite amount of negative particles. As i have said before, please learn these things.
|
I hope this means that you see that the Kelvin scale starts at zero and has no negative values.
And I think Dr. Wolf is rather mistaken to say that ZPE has infinite amount of "negativ particles" whatever those may be. Why not read a real physics book yourself?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''You have done none of the kind, you say vacuum which contains particles (impossible). You relate this now suddenly to cooled down particles and whatever. You are mixing up stuff, I am just commenting on your mess.''
And obtusely boring i say again, learn some physics. Spacetime has an infinite sea of virtual particles. Read up on ''the Dirac Sea,'' and links that the Dirac Sea is the ZPF.
|
The Dirac "sea" is created because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, I have very strong doubts that there is any way of cooling down this sea. But if you have any references for me I (real physics books, not spiritual books) then I will gladly try and look it up).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''I can read and I can understand what is written. Who cares what the first particle is in this case.''
Everything. I am unifying all matter down to photons, which is no ''new'' idea.
|
Well, everything started as "light".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost
''If the eathere is ZPE then call it ZPE, because it has nothing to do with the eather that was supposedly necessary to let electromagnetic waves propagate through vacuum. And that is the problem with you, you just redefine accepted meanings of physics and math without stating that you put a new meaning to those terms.
I study physics every day, it's my job, OC, and I learn something every day. Unfortunately, I have yet to find something to learn from all the threads you have started on BAUT, apart from that most of it is nonsense.''
1. You are talking about electromagnetic waves created by interaction wth the 5th dimension.
2. There is a quantum aether, which by the by, repeating myself again, is the virtual sea of energy. Any educated physicist knows this fact.
And if you study physics -- then you have quite a bit to go i am affraid to inform you. But keep at it.
|
1. Ah, now we need a 5th dimension to create electromagnetic waves? Got any references for that?
2. There is a "Dirac Sea" because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (but it does not contain any "negative particles" whatever those are). If you want to call this an eather, you are free to do so, but then tell the reader that you define that as the eather. But googling for "dirac sea eather" gives only results to woowoo sites, so I guess it is not the normal definition of eather or Dirac sea.
Well, I don't really study physics, I did that years ago at Utrecht University, where I got my PhD in plasma astrophysics. Now I just do research, which requires me to (re)learn more stuff, which I have not looked into before or which I forgot for not using it. My research is mainly electrodynamics/plasma physics near black holes, neutron stars, the Earth's magnetosphere, the Galilean satellites and Venus. I have probably written more scientific papers that you have read coming up with this what-you-call-theory.
You have quite a ways to go, OC, but eventually you will read real physics books and not "spiritual universe" which you probably buy in your local esotheric bookstore.
Later dude!