Well, I don't completly think I made my point. Creationist scientists aren't going around saying "God Did It" and leaving it at that. The inquiry doesnt' stop there. The big difference is that Creation scientists are still on a quest for knowledge. They still want to know how it works or why it works. They don't stop at "God did it." They all firmly believe that "God did it." They are still trying to find out how "God did it". "God did it" isn't the end of the quest for knowledge, it's the beginning.

Where do Creationist start with their quest for knowledge? God.
Where does everyone else start? Random acts of nature.

I know this example has been thrown around a lot, but if you can look at a watch, or a car, or computer and know that there is a designer that built it then how hard is it to believe that one red blood cell, that is vastly more complex, was designed and not a random event. I hope this helps.