View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 13-March-2008, 05:02 PM
damian1727 damian1727 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 142
Default



your wife is a Macroscopic object who is fully deconhered so yes

but an electron in a superstition is not the same....it is not that it is say spin up and then you look and say oh its spin up

its not spin up till you look...it is all possible states till its waveform collapses

hence it can go thro both slits...or bounce off a mirror..(light takes all paths thro a mirror)


''The conclusion of all this is that there is no experiment that can tell us what the electrons are doing at the slits that does not also destroy the interference pattern. This seems to imply that there is no answer to the question of what is going on at the slits when we see the interference pattern. The path of the electron from the electron gun to the screen is not knowable when we see the interference pattern. As Heisenberg said, "The path [of the electron] comes into existence only when we observe it."

?


dont ask me but thats the way it is

sorry if i misunderstood you....its coz you put state at the end and that only happens when the waveform collapses...*brain melt*

Last edited by damian1727 : 13-March-2008 at 07:37 PM.
Reply With Quote