Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
I would expect there to be evidence, if you make the statement that there is evidence.
No, I didn't ask about your beliefs. I asked a very straightforward question based on your earlier statement, and as seems typical, you couldn't give a straightforward answer.
|
Rubbish.
I gave you a straight answer.
The texts and descriptions themselves are what is considered to be the evidence supporting the AA hypothesis; circumstantial because one must accept the texts as factual accounts.
Perspective.
No other evidence, that I'm aware of, exists.
Again, if one allows the possibility of ancient astronauts visiting earth then these texts describing Vimanas constitute evidence. Whereas, if one doesn't allow such a possibility, Vimanas are merely imaginings of the ancients (although, "arial cars" with missles and rays are rather advanced technology for a human four thousand years ago).
Perhaps if you considered my posts in their entirety, rather than snip'ing a sentence or two, you'd better understand my opinions and statements.
So... do
you allow the possibilty of ancient astronauts?
Have you read the texts and descriptions in question?
If you allow ancient astronauts visiting earth could Vimanas then be considered circumstantial evidence of their presence?