Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tassel
And finally, the comparison of science to religion which is not only 180 degrees out of phase with reality, but a comparison I personally find mildly offensive:
|
You may be mildly offended, but not by my call for good - read that EMPIRICAL - science. But you may be offended by the ideas that here on ATM may shake your 'faith' in what you had come to believe. Niether I, nor anyone, can help you in this respect, if you are offended. Talk to religionists on this issue, but it is NOT science. Can you understand the difference?
The rest of it, I will leave unanswered because it makes accusations of my 'breaking forum rules' so I am not in a position to defend myself if so.
You keep coming back to some error in my hypothetical non-theory, and then expect me to defend it here? Why would I? Stop asking me questions, and I will stop responding to yours, especially OT questions. (It is not to 'defend' that I listed my ideas, but to 'illustrate' a point. Got that?) Cease and desist man. I am not inclined to answer OT, and forum rule breaking, questions from posters.
The OP on this thread was as the title says:
"The Demise of ATM Discussions". In this discussion many subjects are broached, such as the
possibility in ATM that either gravity or light constant may not be gotten right.
Tassel's take on this is what? That we should stop discussing because examples of ATM ideas are
mentioned here? For goodness sake! Who's dogma are we supposed to obey here, Tassel? Yours? Or is ATM still a free discussion. If you want to send a complaint to moderators about what I just said, I welcome your complaint. What you are suggesting to us is that we stop talking. If so, then it is truly a demise of ATM discussions. Good grief!!
I therefore, Tassel, forbid you (if you feel 'offended' by what I said) to look at any of my posts, and you may not connect with any of my links posted. Would that suit you better? I do not suffer fools easily.