View Single Post
  #185 (permalink)  
Old 15-March-2008, 04:31 PM
nutant gene 71's Avatar
nutant gene 71 nutant gene 71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: desert city limits, CA USA
Posts: 594
Cool if not solar generated, then article is correct, I think

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornblower View Post
I don't know what they said, because the main article link is not working for me.

I do not see an anomaly here. Stronger prograde wind means more atmospheric angular momentum. Slower rotation of the solid Earth at the same time means less angular momentum in that component. If these are the only variables it looks consistent with conservation of angular momentum, and makes sense in action/reaction terms. There would have to be some sort of ground/air coupling to change the net amount of atmospheric motion, since it is a closed system.
Here is the original article (since the link back doesn't work):

A New Spin on Earth's Rotation (By Michael Schirber, LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 25 February, 2005 7:00 a.m. ET)
http://www.livescience.com/environme...ly_planet.html

Perhaps I misunderstood what the article said, and what you describe as 'conservation of momentum' fits in with what they said. I had it where increased atmospheric winds in direction of Earth's spin would add momentum, not detract. But then the question would remain, where did the accelerated winds come from? Only possible source, in my opinnion, from outside Earth would be solar, but that was not what they claimed. Thanks for pointing this out.
__________________
Credibility is simply incredible... sometimes even to me.
disclaimer