Quote:
Originally Posted by HypothesisTesting
I know this isn't a popular viewpoint on BAUT, but I ask that you think about it any way. Just pretend for a minute that you hadn't heard some of the looniest: like reptilians or moon hoax, then would my argument seem logical?
|
Not really. The quality of a claim rests on the evidence supporting it. To accept or reject a claim based on some subset of implausible
other claims would be to engage in the Strawman Fallacy. That's sort of antithetical to the desire to call an argument "logical".