Censorship is patently wrong when it is the GOVERNMENT limiting your speech and expression.
Personal choice about what speech you allow in your own home is a form of censorship, but it is also an expression of the right of a property owner to decide what is acceptable/allowable on his/her property.
For example: hate speech is not allowed in my house, but (until recently, when my infant son joined the household) you could drop "f-bombs" or say things some consider blasphemous all day...
We used to have some friends, who visited once after they'd consumed too many drinks. The couple started dropping "n-bombs" (they were fighting with one another and trying to embarass each other). I censored their speech that night and they've not been back.
The board's rules have a purpose: they set a certain tone that most of us appreciate. The enforcement of the rules preserves the environment of educational and professional discourse (which does include the ability to engage in play/ fun).
I suspect we've all seen too many boards where the lack of rules (or lack of enforcement) made the board devolve into little more than filth and expletive. I don't want that to happen here. Thus, I think its okay for the BA to set the rules and the Admins to enforce them. THe board is essentially property - and the BA/Admins have the right to set and enforce any rules they choose.
__________________
Talent develops in quiet places, character in the full current of human life.
- Goethe
Jump in with both feet!
- Me, indulging my inner eight-year-old
*** *** ***
"Are you a mad-hatter that just types what he wishes, or have you actually any physics training?"
Occam's Ghost to Grant Hutchison.
|