View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 22-March-2008, 03:50 PM
grant hutchison grant hutchison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriedPhoton View Post
I'm going to disagree with this based upon my belief that consciousness is self-awareness. We understand our self to be that which we feel is connected to us and providing feedback via our nervous system. Inside our heads it's dark and there is no way to perceive anything aside from perhaps a lack of oxygen or chemical imbalance, but even those things we understand as happening to ourselves because we can detect the change. And the rest of our senses we understand are a part of self because we perceive the stimulus they send our brain. I do not look at my neighbor's eye and wonder if her eye is a part of me. I know it isn't because I do not perceive input coming from it. There is a clear distinction between myself and other people, the boundary of which is the extent of my nervous system. A sense of self is about as real as anything in the world. No rationalization is required.
This is an aspect of selfhood which is rather different from the sense of being a continuously existing consciousness: it relates to ownership of one's own body, rather than continuity of conscious existence. It is possible to have one without the other. There are, for instance, people who deny that their own limbs are their own: a patient may be frightened to discover a left arm attached to his body which he does not recognize as being his own, for instance. And yet that person will be aware of his own continuous existence as a person, in continuity before and after the stroke that has led to his current predicament.

Grant Hutchison
Reply With Quote