Thread: Einstein's universe
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-March-2008, 10:31 PM
kyle_baron kyle_baron is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 18
Default
Isn't the Casimir Effect an example of something (energy) from nothing (space)?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

In physics, the Casimir effect or Casimir-Polder force is a physical force arising from a quantized field. The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, placed a few micrometers apart, without any external electromagnetic field. In a classical description, the lack of an external field also means that there is no field between the plates, and no force would be measured between them. Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is only measurable when the distance between the objects is extremely small.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimJast View Post
I found on this forum a proposition by Scaramouche (Big Bang ...Big Schmang: Redshift is an Artifact of Distance) which according to my calculations (presented in http://geocities.com/jim_jastrzebski/sci/3270.htm ) is a right proposition for our universe.

I couldn't join the thread since it was closed and so I'm opening a new one under the more appropriate name of "Einstein's universe". According to my calculations existence of such a universe that might look exactly as ours is the result of inability of nature to create energy from nothing. Which unfortunately is against the mainstream but fortunately might be discussed here and hopefully bringing into the discussion people who are supporting the mainstream view (others on't need to apply).

Presently I'm doing my PhD work in Warsaw University, Poland, proposing in it that we live in Einstein's universe, and consequently I need a lot of criticism regarding my work preferably from smart pople. Unfortunately all the cosmologists in my university, despite being extremely smart, maintain that since energy is not conserved they aren't going to discuss the subject with me unless I switch to something more reasonable as e.g. a supprt for the Big Bang.

However I don't believe in creation of energy from nothing and so I can't agree to switching without any good proof that energy can be created. I made a bet with one of the cosmology students who mainains that it can be easily created and he promissed to deliver a proof. So far he didn't. So I count on someone from this forum to deliver such a proof.

-- Jim