Respondents have queried the scientific status of the 2147 year period of the age. This period is a mathematical product of the precession of the equinox. In a new discovery explained here now, I have found that this period is in precise harmony with cycles of the outer planets and the solar system barycenter. If this has been observed before I would welcome any references.

2147 years is 1/12 of the precessional period of 25764 years. Astronomers will ask why 1/12 is a significant fraction. The reason is that this period is also 12 times the solar system barycenter periodic cycle of length 178.9 years. It appears the age imbeds the barycentric period in terrestrial cycles, as the square root of the great year against the barycentric cycle. These links demonstrate the organic unity of the solar system.

The barycentric cycle links to the outer planets as follows:

Cycles in 179 year barycentric period
Jupiter Saturn 9.03
Jupiter Uranus 13.01
Jupiter Neptune 13.96
Jupiter Pluto 14.02
Saturn Neptune 5.00

~Years between conjunctions
Jupiter Saturn 19.81
Jupiter Uranus 13.75
Jupiter Neptune 12.81
Jupiter Pluto 12.76
Saturn Neptune 35.79

Due to the correlations between these cycles, every 179 years Jupiter returns to the same position in relation to Saturn, Uranus and Pluto, and Saturn returns to the same position relative to Neptune, with very small error. For every nine Jupiter-Saturn conjunctions, there are 13 Jupiter-Uranus conjunctions, 14 Jupiter-Pluto conjunctions, and five Saturn-Neptune conjunctions. Jupiter-Neptune also fits the cycle with larger error. This rhythmic cycle of the outer planets was, I understand, discovered by Sir Isaac Newton. I do not know if Newton or others have noticed the precise harmony to the Great Year of precession of the terrestrial equinox.

My interpretation of this finding is that the wobble of the earth actually is like a spinning top, with interactions between Jupiter and the other outer planets functioning like a whip, maintaining the exact tempo of the top in harmony with the barycentric period.

This is a testable falsifiable scientific claim, not a statement of belief. My figures in the above table are slightly imprecise as I could not readily find exact data. I would welcome if astronomers could check them against more precise ephemerides.

http://www.perceptions.couk.com/precess.html has a simple diagram (from Hancock - Fingerprints of the Gods) which provides a mathematical depiction of these findings, showing the earth through time in the age periods each of length 2147 years. This is not a matter of belief but of science. The diagram illustrates our planet in simple scientific terms of the primary cosmic rhythms of terrestrial time.

This thread has provided examples of precise and rough parallels between events separated by 2147 years. The mathematical cosmic data in this post suggests a scientific basis for this model.