Quote:
Originally Posted by JimJast
This way we might discuss for a month all our illusions instead of physics.
|
Well, creative illusions, are not as boring as your mathematical equations.
Quote:
|
So my advice is to cut the c...
|
Here's a good example of c... "through the vanishing divergence of stress energy tensor".
Quote:
|
The main problem being why do we think that the universe is expanding while it requires only 2.3 times bigger density than (apparently) observed now, to see the expansion as illusion.
|
You're talking about Dark Matter, here?
Quote:
|
As I've already explained in my paper, the explanation of phenomenon of expansion might be the old principle of conservation of energy. And the conservation of energy is built into the Einsteinian gravitation (through the vanishing divergence of stress-energy tensor). So the physics and math might be already there.
|
You're going to find the answer to the expansion, in a mathematical equation? Good luck.
Quote:
|
That's why I'm asking about the physics and if astronomers discussed the issue between themselves as well, please tell me how they came to the conclusion that the energy is not conserved.
|
I believe that energy was conserved at the BB. The universe is not an isolated system. It's a quantum system, and it's a global astronomical system. The conservation of energy is conserved, because the energy did change from a virtual (vacuum) energy to a real energy at the moment of the BB.
[quote]
In my private opinion finding the missing 60% od the universe [quote]
Really? I thought it was 73-74% missing.
Quote:
|
We are obliged to do it also by the Occam's principle. Until we can prove that Occam's principle doesn't work in this case.
|
I can tell you for a fact, that Occam's principle won't work for the universe at large, because as I stated before, the universe is not isolated.