View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2008, 10:53 AM
JimJast JimJast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle_baron View Post
Well, creative illusions, are not as boring as your mathematical equations.

Here's a good example of c... "through the vanishing divergence of stress energy tensor".
This is a shortcut for those who like to use shortcuts (specifically the mathematicians). It means in a more precise language that what gets in has to get out and nothing can stay inside since then it would have to burst eventually. If the energy is the thing that got in, and it also must get out, then it expresses the "law of conservation of energy" that mathematicians understand without long explanation. That's why some c... is useful at least for mathematicians.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle_baron
You're talking about Dark Matter, here?

You're going to find the answer to the expansion, in a mathematical equation? Good luck.
Mathematical equations are sometimes usefull since 2+2=4. So when you look for something and (something)+2=4, then with no more trouble you may say that your something is 2. Of course you can't do the same thing when your "theory" say that c... + another c... = even more c... (as e.g. the Big Bang "theory" says, and so the pure mathmaticians and physicists don't call it a "theory" but a "hypothesis". Yet cosmologists who call themselves "mathematical physicists" call even the Big Bang a "theory" and we repeat after them since we have to use the same language to keep the communication lines opened).

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle_baron
I believe that energy was conserved at the BB. The universe is not an isolated system. It's a quantum system, and it's a global astronomical system. The conservation of energy is conserved, because the energy did change from a virtual (vacuum) energy to a real energy at the moment of the BB.
Now look who is using second of those 2 theories described above :-).

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle_baron
In my private opinion finding the missing 60% od the universe

Really? I thought it was 73-74% missing.
Of course what is missing depends on your theory. Einstein's theory (Einsteins stationary universe) requires the density 6.0 (in uits of 10^-27kg/m^3), what is seen is 2.6, so it is only about 57% according to Einstein's and it might be more according to others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle_baron
I can tell you for a fact, that Occam's principle won't work for the universe at large, because as I stated before, the universe is not isolated.
In Einstein's theory it is isolated and was always like this (Einstein's universe happen to be eternal).