View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 27-March-2008, 04:14 PM
Ken G's Avatar
Ken G Ken G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George View Post
Yet, there does not seem to be much of an appropriate term that identifies and puts conjecture in its place. "Theory" should be reserved term. I can see why everyone wants to use it as a tag to their ideas, but if another term were well established to qualify these incipient theories, then they should be less prone to try to abuse the "theory" term. [Added: I entered "Multiverse Theory" in Google and got 25,000 hits.]
Excellent point. Say what you will about multiverses, but we should at least be able to agree it is not a "scientific theory" in the same way that evolution is, because if it is, then all the complaints about evolution would actually be correct. Concepts like that dilute the meaning of a scientific theory, and instill confusion about what scientists actually do and what their claim on the truth actually is. That's the harm in it, I agree with you.
Quote:
Every dog wants in the house when it's raining, but build them a dog house and they can stay out where they belong.
Yes, the trouble is, everyone wants to eat at the captain's table-- no one wants to be "in the doghouse"!
Reply With Quote