View Single Post
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 27-March-2008, 05:58 PM
George's Avatar
George George is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
Say what you will about multiverses, but we should at least be able to agree it is not a "scientific theory" ...
I was hoping for a snappy new term for a "want-a-be" theory; an antidote for the anecdotal.

An incipient theory could stumble into something that would validate it as a legitimate theory, but [until then] some special term should exist to minimize the confussion or expectations.

Quote:
Yes, the trouble is, everyone wants to eat at the captain's table-- no one wants to be "in the doghouse"!
That's kinda snappy! But a little restrictive to the corn field, of which I'm often fond.

Here is one suggestion for an incipient theory.... Thark. It is a theory that is just bark, thus no bite. "The multiverse thark", hmmm, maybe not.

"The Mulitiverse Theific". Theific -- if it were a theory, we'd call it theory. IOW, too ify to qualify as a theory for now.

"The Multiverse Theison". Theison -- You can go ahead and do a thesis on it, just don't call it a theory.

My usual fee for this effort applies, of course.
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.

Last edited by George : 27-March-2008 at 07:44 PM. Reason: "often" as it might make a pun, gramm
Reply With Quote