Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
I think we'd do well to come away with one new term!
|
Yep.
Quote:
|
The category that offers no predictability but does have observational evidence I would claim does not exist as a separate entity within science (it is just a semantic restatement of the observational evidence).
|
I assume this is our target term, since the lack of testable predicitions alone spells doom, since predicability is a well established requirement of the scientific method, and any fuzzy that has no observational evidence,too, is D.O.A. as a "theory", once this new term becomes established.
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.
"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
Last edited by George : 28-March-2008 at 09:38 PM.
Reason: quick doom phrase
|