Thread: Shape of space?
View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 30-March-2008, 09:34 PM
Steve Limpus's Avatar
Steve Limpus Steve Limpus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmocrazy View Post
If this were the case then the four known forces of nature balance out this inflation to keep matter in the form that we observe, therefore becoming the cosmological constant?
Yes the balance between the four forces result in the universe we observe.

The cosmological constant was cooked up by Einstein because his calculations predicted the universe must expand or contract, but he didn't trust them - he favoured a static eternal universe. The constant was a correction of sorts to counteract the predicted expansion or contraction. When Hubble showed the universe was expanding, Einstein quietly erased the cosmological constant.

But then, the expansion was observed to be accelerating. Welcome back cosmological constant. I don't think scientists have a good handle on what it is, but I've often seen references to a kind of 'vacuum energy' of space, or perhaps it is a vestige of the force that drove inflation. There seems to be some consensus the rate of acceleration varies over time.
__________________
If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it... of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which are only accessible to our reason in their most elementary forms...
Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote