Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JimJast
|
Read it. Here's my synopsis: in SR's flat spacetime, energy conservation can be formulated as either a differential equation or an integral equation, which are mathematically equivalent. When the two forms are generalized to GR's curved spacetime, the equivalence breaks down... until one introduces pseudo-tensors, which allows one to restore the equivalence.
You know what I don't see? Anything that actually supports your claim that energy is not conserved in curved spacetime. Your citation of this article to support your claim is... puzzling (I've already used "plain wrong" enough times in my previous post).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JimJast
If you still insist that the mianstream supports global conservation of energy in expanding universe then we may move ''Einstein universe" from ATM section to the mainstream section since we may utilize conservation of energy as legitimate means of deriving results.
|
Your insistence throughout this thread that the universe is not expanding roots this thread firmly in ATM territory.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JimJast
Which so far the mainstream opposed since it maintanied (e.g. prof. John Baez) that energy is not globally conserved.
|
Maybe you should read Prof. Baez's article again.
Still waiting for you to answer my direction questions to you.