View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2008, 10:37 AM
JimJast JimJast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim View Post
JimJast[...] it is a violation of BAUT Rules not to answer direct, pertinent questions about your ATM idea.
From what I can tell, Codeslinger's questions are direct and pertinent; in several cases, they address issues you raised yourself. Please answer them asap.
The Codeslinger's questions (not necessarily "pertinent") with my answers are:

Quote:
1. Please show us, mathematically, why energy cannot be conserved in an expanding universe.
I don't think it can be done in a rigorius way if this is what you mean by "mathematically" and if you mean by this something else, please explain what it is. Consequently my best answer to this question would be like it was the first time when I answered it and you called it "word salad" not specifying what you considered "salad".

Quote:
2. Please show us, mathematically, why conservation of energy necessarily implies a stationary universe.
The answer is the same as answer to question 1.

[quote]
3. Which physicists oppose Big Bang because of conservation of energy? So far you have only one who may or may not fit that description. Needless to say, "one" != "many".
[\QUOTE]
I have to ask them if they want to have their name published on BAUT forum and if they agree I come back and let you know which.

Last edited by JimJast; 04-April-2008 at 10:39 AM. Reason: typos