View Single Post
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 07-April-2008, 04:42 AM
SkepticJ's Avatar
SkepticJ SkepticJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
Now, I'd call those both fantasy. "Kryptonian" is just another way of giving someone fantastic powers with no real explanation.... It's like the discussion of Steampunk: That's fantasy too.
And, "It works by sending tachyon particles into modevendium alloy charged with anti-protons," doesn't really tell you anything either. Star Trek's sci-fi, though, right?

How about Ringworld, with virtually unbreakable materials and luck as a biologically-based trait? Where do you draw the line?

I've got to disagree with the second. Some steampunk is fantasy-like, though I would still call it sci-fi, just very loose sci-fi. There's nothing in The Difference Engine that couldn't have really happened, had Charles Babbage not ticked off the people he needed to fund his machines.

There is a real Difference Engine, now, in The Science Museum, London, built according to the mechanical tolerances achievable at the time, and it works just fine.

I'm actually writing a novel that's partly set in a post-steampunk world--they've moved onto electromechanical technology. Nothing is impossible, and most things are very probable in the story.
__________________
If we don't play god, who will?-James Watson
I never think of the future, it comes soon enough.-Albert Einstein
The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.-Tom Waits
Reply With Quote