Quote:
Originally Posted by peter J.
I have been researching the Apollo missions for a long time...
|
Welcome to BAUT, Peter J. I've been doing that for a long time too, almost since watching Sputnik 1 pass overhead in October 1957.
Quote:
|
I encourage people to look very carefully at the photos - study photography and lighting.
|
Been doing that since 1968 with a few years as a professional and parts of my job being analysing photos and teaching photography, and I've yet to see a decent argument for a hoax, or at least one that stands up to scrutiny.
There are other skilled and experienced photographers who hang out here and will be keen to hear what you say about the Apollo photos.
Quote:
|
I think the videos are even easier to debunk, they are kinda silly actually.
|
Please tell us you didn't watch silly little compressed videos on the internet, but real ones such as on the Spacecraft Films DVDs like the many hours of 16mm movie film and TV images from Apollo 17, including the lunar surface TV coverage long after Cernan and Schmitt left the moon. When I had the opportunity to watch all the Apollo 17 footage I thought some of it might be boring, but no way, I enjoyed the whole lot and watched some bits over and over, and read along with the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.
Now that you've "met" JayUtah (post 93), you may like to spend many hours doing research on his web site and gaining some idea of his knowledge of photography and Apollo:
http://www.clavius.org
You might find answers at Clavius to some of the questions your research raised, and Jay is most likely very keen to hear about anywhere you found him wrong at Clavius.
Anyway, do open a new thread and present your evidence for a moon-landing hoax. Please note that part of rule 13 here says, "...you will defend your arguments. Direct questions must be answered in a timely manner."
Rules For Posting To This Board