Why only papers from the late 1960s, where there is enough new stuff published, e.g.
de Jager and Versteegh from 2005 and an addition to it (or correction on one mechamism) by
Shirley from 2006.
What exactly are we supposed to understand from
the Sun moving through its own magnetic field? The sun moves in its 179 year looping around the barycenter. The solar wind which carries the magnetic field, which originates from the Sun, flys away at 400 km/s, how is the Sun moving through this?
GR effect by planets on radiation and relativistic matter in the Sun's core causes slight convection cells in the solar interior leading to a varying amount of heat reaching the surface and to the production of magnetic fields. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
Also I do not understand anything about this claim
The fact that radiation is more strongly affected by gravity than ordinary matter at non-relativistic velocities is the basis of my proposal. I guess you are going to explain that to us.
For now, I will make the assumption that radiation in the solar core (as an ensemble of mass) is accelerated by 5/3 times as much as non-relativistic matter and that there is a similar effect on the relativistic component of matter in the Sun also. I think that you first need to show that this assumption is justified. Why would gravity work harder on relativistic particles?
Please, start from point zero, show that your assumptions are justified before you go any deeper into this stuff. And read some recent papers on the topic.
And for those who, like me, do not know what syzygy is (no it is not wysiwyg's sister),
here is the definition from Merriam Webster. A difficult word for alignment.