View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 06:15 PM
parejkoj's Avatar
parejkoj parejkoj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: spacing out
Posts: 630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matherly
Specifically, I felt the topic of the Big Bang Theory was proving to be a fruitful one.
How so? ID (as formulated by the Discovery Institute, and others) has nothing useful to say about cosmology, and certainly has made no predictions whatsoever.

As to the macroevolution/microevolution canard, I have one thing to say (besides all the things that are said on Talk Origins and in the NOVA program about Dover, which apparently neither JesusSaves nor Lonest@r have bothered to watch): Tiktaalik. That's all I have to say regarding biology in this thread, except to reiterate that those who still want claim that ID may have scientific merit really need to watch "Judgement Day" and really pay attention. It's an excellent program (and it is available for free on the website!), and covers all the major points very, very well.
__________________
"What do you care what other people think?" -- Richard Feynman
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Feynman, at the conclusion of his Challenger report