Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
That's not BBT. BBT is about the development of the universe.
And, that's not BBT either. You're getting into areas of biology.
|
BBT as I remember learning it was that the universe was basically one large mass, an explosion occured and fragments created the planets, moons, stars ect.. This explosion was also the reasoning as to why the universe was constantly expanding, but then we determined the it was expanding not radially, (like a theortical explosion) but elliptically..... I then came along string theory and dark matter. The biology part comes later.
Quote:
|
The Overton ruling constrains and defines what may be called ‘science’ and what must be called ‘religion’
|
Legalism at it's finest, that is my argument. Basically stating, science is defined as being......, therfore religion is not science, ID is religion, therefore ID holds no validity in science, and therefore will be ignored....
Quote:
|
“While anybody is free to approach a scientific inquiry in any fashion they choose, they cannot properly describe the methodology as scientific,
|
Sounds great...
Quote:
|
The conclusion that creation science has no scientific merit or educational value as science has legal significance
|
Therefore silencing the opposing view...... kinda hard to make a one-sided argument....