If you read my post more carefully, I never said THEY used Photoshop,you did. You are proving my point that many "reseachers" are not careful in reading and noticing detail. I said YOU need to use you "Photoshop" skills. You are also letting alot of emotion get in your way, perhaps you are insecure about what you think. Frankly, there's no way your going to get any objective analysis with a mindset like that. And, I'm not going to walk you through it step by step (and argue about it), your a big boy. You need to do your own research, because you have to go through that discovery process for yourself. I told you it is in most photos and all videos, if you want to look, it's not hard to find what I'm talking about. I told you what to look for. If you can explain all the photographic flaws that I see with some scientific explaination, that's just great, that's your own conclusion. I'm really not trying to convince you otherwise and don't worry about what it would take to convince me, why does it matter. The point of my last post is that there is much more there than meets the naked eye. Are you willing to admit that there might be something you missed? I did.

“Doubt, indulged and cherished, is in danger of becoming denial; but if honest, and bent on thorough investigation, it may soon lead to full establishment of the truth.”
Ambrose Bierce