I really believe the burden of proof goes both ways.
NASA has satisfied its burden of proof. The body of that proof is the evidence you're trying desperately to explain away.
You say all that evidence is fake. That's an affirmative rebuttal. All the burden of proof for an affirmative rebuttal rests on the affirmer.
We need to question things that we are told, I don't accept everything that people tell me...
What have you done to question the authors of the books and web sites you're using to supply you with arguments?
Is it important to question according to a proper knowledge of the material? Or does ignorant questioning suffice too?
You think governments don't lie?
Do you think we dispute your claims because we trust the government? We dispute your claims because they fail to measure up to fact. The government has nothing to do with it.
|