View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-April-2008, 04:56 PM
tommac's Avatar
tommac tommac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar View Post



1) Don't forget that when talking about relativity, you have to specify relative to what?


2) Yeah, but then why would more distant objects be redshifted more?


3) But that's quite a while in terms of a scientific theory. You would be surprised how many times GTR has been tested and how well it is understood.



4) No, unless you can identify a mass that would create such a huge gravitational field.

1) Relative to everything? If the universe is expanding, and we are not shrinking, thus making the universe expand, then the universe would have to be expanding relative to everything. The question is, is time-space expanding? If so is it expanding relative to everything? This is what I have a hard time believing in.

2) The distant objects would be redshifted more because of distance needed to travel. As we sink into a well all distances are further. Thus making very distant objects further away.

3) The same could also be true about the world being flat and that planets and stars rotating around the earth. How many years was that theory taken as absolute truth.

4) A black hole? , The center of our galaxy, or our galaxy as a whole?, the things that make galaxies move?
Reply With Quote