View Single Post
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 15-April-2008, 05:35 AM
rtomes rtomes is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornblower View Post
1. Suppose there is no such resonance. Then what?
Then the calculation does not fit the sunspot very well in comparison.
Quote:
2. If you back-extrapolate, will this predict the Maunder minimum?
I note that I had 264 years of sunspot numbers, so must have started after the Maunder minimum.

It is possible to see how this model would explain the Maunder minimum, but I have not actually run it for that period. It actually would need a reasonable amount of earlier data to prove that because the resonance has got a "memory" with a half life of about 70 years. That means that you need information from about 1500 onwards to test this thoroughly.

Last edited by rtomes; 15-April-2008 at 05:35 AM.. Reason: typo