Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
Perhaps you should review your posts?
Originally Posted by Lonest@r View Post
This thread stems from the comments from Oklahoma: One Step from Doom blog. I am always one up for a good intellectual converation and this seems like a good place to debate Evolution.
|
Sorry, I suppose that was before I knew the importance between BBT and Evolution, or that BBT was not part of Evolution. Also let me state I never intended to refer to 'intelligence' as in a formal ID 'theory', but rather some form of intelligence. Maybe this explains it, I looked up term 'cdesign proponentsists' that I've seen posted wondering what it was and I found,,
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/...g_link_cd.html,
hmmmm, 1987, that would have been right at the time of my middle school....
Quote:
|
As to your assertion of the philosophical validity of ID, so what?
|
It's not religion.....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gillianren
If you don't know how evolution works, how do you know it isn't any good?.......add in "BBT" as well.
|
Thats why I am here. I know the basics, I can read 'prepared' material, but I am looking for discussion and insight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abelian Grape
Sorry if you were misled by a quote from NASA. If they literally meant that, they would have seriously overstepped the bounds of what science can say. I suspect they were trying to make a point (pun intended) for the purpose of providing a simplified explanation of a very complex topic. It was, after all, not a graduate-level course.
|
But this is NASA
Foundations of Big Bang Cosmology, not some high school teacher or news reporter. I am being directed toward these sites to disprove any 'myth' or mis-spoken words that I may have said, and now I am being told that it is incorrect. Just look back at my use of the word 'explosion' and maybe you'll see the humor I am experiencing....