Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Tulip
Now Warren, I hope you are not trying to derail my thread. I take no responsibility for the totally irrelevant chart that our dinosauric friend attached. You should look at my attachments, not his. Admittedly there is more brain-strain in the numbers I gave, but they are up for falsification.
 |
From what I have seen no threat level to worry about. Warren has been very helpful with questions in the past and provided an amazing warning. I am running a Milky Way set of numbers for Boinc and do not want to upset that program either.
The big number and the way it is determined has so far been the focus of most of the talk. What I found interesting is that there is the 0.1 year change in the length of the cycle. Wouldn't that indicate that there is energy being removed from the system just as the increasing distance to the moon likewise indicates energy being removed from the system?
Have to go, the cat is insisting on typing again. Quite frustrating
