Well, yes and no. If we integrate for the acceleration of gravity of a disk plane on a particle, we have Int G (M/A) dx dy (R-x) / d^3, where M/A is the mass per area which is uniform, R is the distance of the particle from the center, d is the distance from the particle to each point in the disk, and (x,y) are the coordinates of a point using the center of the disk as the origin. From this, we get

Int G (M/A) dx dy (R-x) / sqrt[(R-x)^2 +y^2]^3

= Int G (M/A) dx (R-x) * [2 * sqrt(r^2 - x^2) / (R-x)^2 / sqrt[(R-x)^2 + (r^2 - x^2)] ] for y = -sqrt(r^2 - x^2) to sqrt(r^2 - x^2)

but the last integration for dx does lead to complicated elliptic integrals, three different kinds, in fact, so let's avoid that by finding a solution for a specific R, such as R=r, for acceleration of gravity acting on a particle right at the edge of the disk. Then we get

Int 2 G (M/A) dx sqrt(r^2 - x^2) / (r-x) / sqrt[(r-x)^2 - r^2 -x^2]

= Int 2 G (M/A) dx sqrt(r+x) sqrt(r-x) / (r-x) / sqrt[2r * (r-x)]

= Int 2 G (M/A) dx sqrt(r+x) / (r-x) / sqrt(2r)

= 2 G (M/A) / sqrt(2r) * [ 2 sqrt(2r) atanh[sqrt(r+x) / sqrt(2r)] - 2 sqrt(r+x)]

from x = -r to r, so

= 4 G (M/A) [ atanh(1) - 1]

Here, since x = -r to r, it reduces to just zero for the whole thing for -r, but for +r, the part in atanh becomes sqrt(r+x)/sqrt(2r) = 1, and atanh(q) = (1/2)[ln(1+q) - ln(1-q)], so if q=1, then - ln(1-q) = -ln(0) = - (-infinity) = infinity. We have nothing else that might cancel out the infinity here, so that is the result for a disk plane. The gravity is infinite at the edge of the disk plane.

Now, I am thinking that finite masses cannot result in infinite force, so the only thing I see that might cause this is due to considering any and all point masses that lie directly in front of the particle, even within zero distance, like singularities. I am thinking that a better method would be to allow some distance between the particle and the closest possible point mass. For the gravity of something like a planet or the sun, this could possibly be as small as the distance between atoms, so wouldn't make much difference in the integration for those, at least that of spheres. With galaxies, however, especially being disks, I'm thinking an average or minimum possible distance between stars must be accounted for, at the very least being that of the diameter of a typical star.

__________________
Let's put together the pieces of The Grand Puzzle . (website)

"Let's define another operator, Sz, which we won't pay any attention to."
"This transformation will automatically make zero equal zero."
"It may be true that zero equals zero -- and that is certainly an equality -- but I don't want to go into the details at this time."