Hmmm....let me see if I can explain this. Maybe I just can't.

If I take a line (1 dimention), I go from Point A to Point B...and I will never end up where I started. If I take a circle (2 dimentions), I go from Point A to Point B, I will always end up where I started. If I take a Sphere(3 dimentions), and start at any point I will eventually end up where I started, but I will often come close but not quite where I started...as all my lines will not be parallel.

But adding X number of spacial dimentions (not time)...we can end up going from one point and coming back to the same place all the time everytime. From the way I understand...this is the current model of the universe.

In the end, our universe needs to act as a 3 dimentional object, a 2 dimentional object, and a 1 dimentional object all at the same time. It does not have a center like a line. It does not have an area like a circle. It does not have volume like a sphere.

However, here on earth or in any other part on a planet or in a universe...you need to have these three things in order for life to work.

So...my question really is how can there be a universe where none of these things are true...yet all need to be true for life to exist?

********************************

My other part of my argument is basically that the Big Bang happened at a singulatiry in which all mass was condensed...and it was actually the universe...with all the properties within it.

At some point, the singularity had to expand. All that mass was down to a single point...and all that mass was pure energy. This type of expansion should be able to be reproduced.

A Type 1A supernova gives off the same amount of light every time because it reaches a point of critical mass and explodes.

So, this singularity might be explained by reaching a point of critical mass at which time it expands. What I am arguing is that if there were just a little less mass, the the critical mass would never come about and then no expansion. If there were more mass...then the expansion would have happened before all that mass was in the singularity.

*********************

Another thought of the singularity is that it would have had to been universal in density. Heavier elements would be at every point just like the lighter elements. However in a Big Crunch, he heavier elements should be closer to the center of the singularity...and the lighter ones on the outside.

Given the current model of the universe...the singularity is the universe...and therefor there is no center of the singularity either.

**********************

Hawkings explains that it does not have to be a singularity if you introduce time as an imaginary number (i). But if you use 'i' then singularities don't exist. I don't quite understand it all myself...but I am just going off of his suggestion.