View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 30-April-2008, 03:59 AM
Lonewulf's Avatar
Lonewulf Lonewulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eppelheim, Germany
Posts: 4,124
Send a message via AIM to Lonewulf
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravens_cry View Post
I don't see that as a dumb question. In fact, if it could be done, it would definitely be the best possible thing to do. The logistics on the other hand would be very difficult. Like water, carbon dioxide is a burnt substence, the end result of an energy releasing reaction (not sure what the technical word is) Any effort to sperate the molocule would require considerable energy. I am not sure it would be practical to do this in smokestack. However with the right catalyst, this could be done in a lower energy environment. After all, plants do it.
While writing this, I searched the internet and I found this. http://technology.newscientist.com/a...into-fuel.html
Very fascinating, from what I understand of the temperatures involved it could be done on site, using waste heat for part of the reaction. On the other hand I would prefer a reaction that released oxygen. From what I understand about mini article it may be possible. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1944444
This is very exciting.
Would any of this work for Nitrous Oxide?

From what I've read, Nitrous Oxide is about over 200 times as worse as Carbon Dioxide, even if only a little bit of it gets into the atmosphere; it lasts for a very long time when it does, though. Methane would also be a problem.
__________________
"A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right." -- Thomas Paine

Being intelligent is not a felony. But most societies evaluate it as at least a misdemeanor. -- Heinlein

Creationists make it sound as though a "theory" is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night. -- Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote