from another forum:

Why don't you gather evidence? See if you can get a small amount of money donated, then have samples taken from the so-called chemtrails, and then have those samples analysed by an independent firm? Have a firm chain of evidence established? That way the results could be presented without ambiguity. You could state:

"The sampling aircraft, a LR35, trailed behind the aircraft making the chemtrails, a KC-135, tail number 67-12345. The trails were being made in position xx.xxxN yyy.yyyW at 1000 CST on 23 JUL 08, at an altitude of 35,000 feet, whilst the KC-135 was traveling from VPS to LAX on a heading of 302 degrees magnetic, speed 285 KIAS. The samples were taken using method XYZ under the supervision of Prof B. Rainy, accredited as a chemtrail investigator by the Arizona Department of Chemtrail Investigation. The sample, under chain of evidence procedures to ensure no contamination could take place, was analysed by the US Chemical Testing and Analysis Labs of Buckmeister, AZ. US CTAL is accredited as a a Grade A facility under Regulation 123 of the US Chemical Testing Regulations. The analysis, shown in Annex A, show abnormally high levels of suspicium (Sm) and conspirion (Cp). The recorded levels were 3000 and 5000 parts per million, respectively. These are respectively 1000 and 2000 times higher than the normal safe limits according to data published by the EPA, FDA, and NOAA (see Annex B). There are no activities within 500 miles of the sampling area that are known to release suspicium or conspirion."

That would be evidence.... yet so far, no-one - let me repeat that: NO-ONE - has actually done the necessary evidence gathering exercise.

Now why would that be?

__________________
"For ignorance to reign, all it takes is for knowledgable people to say nothing"

Lonewulf