View Single Post
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 03-May-2008, 12:14 PM
rtomes rtomes is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl_Smith View Post
...
The top plot is distance in Z axis, the next is VZ (velocity in Z axis), the next is AZ (acceleration), and the last is delta_AZ.

This graph is the same as above, but all quantities have the sign removed (mathematical absolute):


Once again the 'waves' seem to shift phase with regard to the sunspot cycle, with no obvious link between them.
Hi Carl

you are right that there is no obvious link between the two.

The non-obvious link is that the spectrum of the two have a set of very similar periods in them as I have shown. As I have stated, the result does not give you a good correlation with the Sunspot numbers unless an additional assumption is made. That assumption is that there is a natural resonance of 10.5 years in the Sun with quite a high Q factor. Then it is possible to get a correlation of 0.66 with the sunspot numbers.

I began to make a spreadsheet to try an demonstrate this to you. However yesterday I bought some extra memory for my computer and when I installed it my computer stopped working and stayed that way after I took it out. I took in in for repair today (Saturday in NZ) but I won't get it back until Monday at the earliest. As I also mentioned, I will be away from Wednesday morning until the thread finishes, so suddenly the time has got squeezed.

At present I am logging in from another computer but I don't have ready access to all my files, so will do the best that I can to answer any further questions.

One note about the sign removal Carl - it is only the displacement that should have the sign removed.

Regards
Ray

Last edited by rtomes; 03-May-2008 at 12:17 PM.. Reason: add sentence at end