
04-May-2008, 02:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
Posts: 1,224
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Tulip
Please see attached schematic diagram of some main features of the 179 year cycle of the solar system barycentre. Noting that the 179 year period contains nine Jupiter-Saturn cycles and five Saturn-Neptune cycles, I have presented these as a nine point star and a five point star respectively.
The point of this diagram is to illustrate a major structural framework for the temporality of the solar system. In relation to earth, it is noteworthy that this pattern repeats every 178.9 years with strong regularity, so this picture is in a sense eternal. As previously noted, twelve of these patterns produce a cosmic age. The Saturn-Neptune cycle is like the 'cosmic second', considering the 2147 year long age as a minute.
The whole diagram is not fixed against the stars, but follows the SSB wavelength which moves 1/12 of the zodiac per cycle. To illustrate this movement, Neptune orbit is 164.8 years; 178.9/164.8=1.086; 0.086~=1/12 (>0.0833), so Neptune advances by just over one zodiacal sign between its periodic 179 year conjunctions with Jupiter and Saturn, starting each period in a new sign and covering all signs each age.
On the fortieth anniversary of the Paris Uprising of May 1968, it is interesting to pick a cherry regarding the SSB. Starting a 178.9 year cycle at 0, there are ten such cycles in 1789 years. Looking at the storming of the Bastille as a turning point, it is interesting that the Sorbonne events happened 178.9 years later. 1610, 179 years before, happens to be when Galileo found the moons of Jupiter. This cycle shows these times happened when Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and nearly Uranus were in the same relative positions.
|
A pretty picture such as yours does nothing to resolve my misgivings about your line of thought. All you are showing is a pattern of motion of the Sun and planets whose period is approximately 1/144 of our best estimate of the precession period. I would wish to see an analysis of many such precessional cycles to see whether or not that ratio might converge on exactly 1/144, or at least librate around it. Since we have no useful observations over more than a small fraction of one precession cycle, we are stuck. In a nutshell, still no compelling reason to suspect any sort of resonant dynamic causality.
|