We digress. I have tremendous respect for astronauts. Strap a million pounds of explosives to your A and use it to blast into space to expand horizons. Wow, thats guts, and taking your chances.
Tools and techniques to fabricate is relevent how? Not teaching class here. I did that back in the early ninties. We could both probably fabricate it but time and energy to do so would be prohibitive. Applying fabrication to the volume of WR data offered speaks of tremendous time and resource investment to what end? I don't see anybody making any money on this. What would you budget to do the entire thing and where would you get the Leonov vid?
The whole WR story hinges on one aspect. The alledged ship. There are a number of photos that show the area although they are too grainy to say anything with absolute certainty. They are open to interpretation. The object isn't going anywhere so at some point in the near future the truth will be revealed.
I say there is reason for inquiry and your position is that the case is closed. Does that sum it up accuratly?
Do you think these people are lying? I do not have any personal knowledge of this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmIRU72b9_k
Debating your or my qualifications to have an opinion is to evade. As if attacking my character has any bearing on the issue.
I have no obligation to defend because I make no claims. I am investigating the claims of others.
http://apollo.sese.asu.edu/webmap/im...15-M-1583.html
Out of all of the A15 datasets this one is where it looks most like a landform. When you zoom to the area it looks like a hill. If you add more contrast the hill top ridge becomes the top edge of the anomaly. That is assuming you view it from the perspective it was filmed from and not rotated ninty degrees to match true north like the online display is. Rotated it becomes the left edge.
To the left/top of that ridge line the landform at first looks like a slope from the ridge. Play with the contrast and re evalute and the area to the left/top looks lake crater floor with the ridge being the side of a solid object that has a vertical rise from crater floor.
That is why I see a reason to not declare case closed. As to your demand that I modify my web page to suit your evaluations, I have to leave it as to what I think.
Make a page with an independent evaluation and if it does not have a character attack against me as proof against someone elses claim I will add a link to it. I do clearly state on my page that the consensus of opinion from the science community is that the WR story is a hoax.
Now you can take every sentence here and paste all of your logical assertions around it showing handwaving or whatever but that changes nothing on the issues that I question.
If you just want the final say on this, post whatever and I will not respond. If you have a question of me relevent to the issue I will try to answer.