Quote:
Originally Posted by Veeger
I tried your approach to looking at the article, removing everything that depends on the eyewitness testimony and you're right. You're left with nothing really extraordinary. A rock where moss was missing in a circular configuration and a trace amount of soil radiation. (which was apparently enough to inhibit moss growth) That's it.
|
That in itself can be strange if you look at it though.
So let's look deeper.
The Condon Report that Astrophotographer linked to gives much more detail than the Wiki link.
In that, it becomes MUCH MORE CLEAR why JayUtah said to not take the witness testimonial word for word.
Because the story changed drastically and radically and there was no reliability to the mans story.
The radiation was studied but not found anomolous to natural conditions.
In addition, it demonstrates fabrication of evidence and planting of evidence took place.
Including the addition of two metal (silver) artifacts recovered a year after the event that were highly unlikely to have been missed the first time and likely planted.