Yes, I agree completely with that article that mistaking objectivism for a "power structure" (like a majority consensus) has negative ramifications for science. Indeed, it is just that conviction that caused me to counter that argument so aggressively, I admit in a way that might not have always seemed cordial but I meant no personal affront. I just think it is crucial to bear in mind what objective thinking actually is, independent from any social structure such as consensus agreement of those in authority.

__________________
If we understood everything going on in the head of a pin... we still wouldn't know not to step on the pointy end.

People think the problem with models is that they are limited by our minds, but the greater problem is that our minds are limited by our models.