Yes, you are exactly correct!

"Open System" OR "Closed system"

For over 100 years Mainstream has 'inadvertently' defined all of the cause/effect correlations of how the universe is working to be in a 'Closed System'.

The real problem though is that the BBT(s) have NO cause to any effect, ONLY a 'transition' from an unknown to a percieved "Effect".

They use the term "Singularity" as though they know what it means, and describe what is "Happening" at and near it, while at the same time, declaring it to be mathematical only, and totally "Undefined"....AND that ALL of the Laws of Physics break down there, and means that the theory must be invalid.

Now, while I agree that they had no reason to do this until 1997, please explain to me why ALL of the greatest minds in physics ie: Hawking, Penrose, Thorne, Presskill, Wheeler, Susskind.....(Especially when they were working on Cosmic Censorship) DID NOT realize that SINCE we have NEVER found even one Non-rotating SMBH, that the "Point Singularity" solution MATHS were NOT Ever applicable.

SO, Not only does Cosmic Censporship apply to singularities, BUT a "Point Singularity" Non-rotating BH has never be 'observed'. Not once, anywhere in our universe...NADA.

SO, mainsteam has and did find the solution, a long time ago...The Rotating Kerr Black Hole with it's "Ring Singularity"!

BUT, the alternative theory...QSSC don't believe that Black Holes and singularities even exist, SO who was the onus on to falsify the "Naked Singularity" "inside solution" of a FLRW EFE 'expanding' with "Inflation" Grapefruit sized ('sphere'ical cow") after T= 10 ^-35 secs???

SO, it really is pretty simple, once you understand it, that a "Point Singularity" cannot even exist, inside or outside of any black hole.

SO all of the expanding or contracting "horizons" or even that special case of perfectly tuned "Spherical" (Cow) universe....Einsteins original lambda, have NEVER even had the possibility of existing....


BUT, can any mainstream cosmologist admit this, and have a good portion of what has been developed since 1929, when LeMaitre and Friedmann came up with their Schwarzschild solution?

Critical Density for the universe as a whole simply does NOT exist!!!

AND, this is NOT the only problem, is it??? NO NO NO

SR, VS an aboslute space....that is space traveling everywhere at a constant "c"/ Aether has been at issue for over 100 years. AND, the alternative to SR is what is "Real" Physical Space, Just as the Only "Real" physical singularities are the "Ring Singualrities" in SMBH's, which is where that "Aether"/Quantum Gravity comes from!!!!

NOW< if you don't believe this, just do this...

ALL of the most knowledgeable...ie, Tim Thompson, KenG, Publius, Grant Hutchinson

ALL of you just do your physics from four different galaxies in our observable universe all at vastly different directions and distances from the Milkey Way.

Two things will definitely happen....

1. Because SR really only has the "speed of light in it's own frame" as 'instananeous at any distance' when it is 'going away from us', the 'observer' (ie; When the 'space ship takes off at "c" for Alpha C, it gets their instaneously, BUT when it or light takes off from Alpha C to us, it takes 4 light years to reach us), when you try to reproduce this from your galaxy, say 5 or 10 biilion light years away, it will be opposite for all of you to being here on earth.

2. According to BBT(s) and Inflation, every observer in the universe is at the center of his own "Grapefruit", SO, each one of you at your location in your galaxy, will have to INSIST that the universe, if it were in a big crunch MUST be 'shrinking down to your' T=0 or T= 10^-35 "Point" location.

I know, you can't let all of cosmology come tumbling down in one fell swoop, AND trying to figure out what to switch off to mathematically is huge!!!

The problem,,,,,Describing how the universe is working mathematically is FAR more difficult than anyone has ever realized!!!

The "real Problem" is that SR is based on definitions at the Division by 0, and ultimately so is the expanding/contracting down to 0 BBT.

There is one more that has the same Division by 0 problem, but I will leave that alone for now.

Everytime that Richard/Publius has said that doing anything in KERR is hugely problematic, is only the tip of the iceburg.

Also, descrining the universe 'geometrically' has been shown to be extremely "Consistent" in the MATHS, BUT that is NOT how the universe is "REAL" ly working!!!

In fact, this is the reason that Gravity is SO misunderstood....How WEAK is gravity "REALLY"...you will be surprised!

ETA: would a Mod please fix the title of this post.

It should have read....There can ONLY be ONE

Thanks

__________________
RussT
________________________________
Everything is, as it should be, otherwise, it wouldn't be!