View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2008, 10:37 AM
JimJast JimJast is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
JimJast, You're not dialoging with Chris Hillman, [...]
Too bad...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
Second, a better place for you to advocate ATM would be in the ATM section, not here in About BAUT. Please?
Actually I'm not "advocating ATM" but just advocating regular physics, which violation by the mainstream theorists angried also Feynman. So I'm just trying to prevent guys mentioned by Feynman to get away with an assertion that the general relativity supports only 4-momentum conservation and not the energy and momentum conservation separately. The assertion is needed to support the hypothesis of expanding universe the astronomers insist on since if energy were strictly conserved, as Feynman says, it had to be admitted that there is no expansion. The regular general relativity (with conservation of energy) takes care of Hubble redshift through an interesting mechanism forced on the nature by its inability to create energy from nothing. The mechanism that the Big Bang theorist (being rather good mathematicians) might have known but didn't care to talk about it while astronomers insisted that the universe is expanding for sure. After all mathematicians are supposed to help the astronomers and not to ruin the results of their observations.
Reply With Quote